The bruised U.S. economy limped through the first quarter, growing at just a 0.6% pace as housing and credit problems forced people and businesses alike to hunker down. The statistic did not meet what economists consider the classic definition of a recession, which is a retraction of the economy. This means that although the economy is stuck in a rut, it is still managing to grow, even if modestly.

Consumers—whose spending is vital to the country’s economic health—turned much more cautious, also restraining overall economic growth in the first quarter. Their spending rose at just a 1% pace. To bolster the economy, the Federal Reserve is expected to lower a key interest rate by one-quarter percentage point to 2%.

If you didn’t have ethanol, you would not have the prices we have today

The globe’s worst food crisis in a generation emerged as a blip on the big boards and computer screens of America’s great grain exchanges. As prices rise, major grain producers including Argentina and Ukraine, battling inflation caused in part by soaring oil bills, were moving to bar exports on a range of crops to control costs at home. It meant less supply on world markets even as global demand entered a fundamentally new phase.

At the same time, food was becoming the new gold. Investors fleeing Wall Street’s mortgage-related strife plowed hundreds of millions of dollars into grain futures, driving prices up even more. By Christmas, a global panic was building. With fewer places to turn, and tempted by the weaker dollar, nations staged a run on the American wheat harvest.

Foreign buyers, who typically seek to purchase one or two months’ supply of wheat at a time, suddenly began to stockpile. They put in orders on U.S. grain exchanges two to three times larger than normal as food riots began to erupt worldwide.

The food price shock now roiling world markets is destabilizing governments, igniting street riots and threatening to send a new wave of hunger rippling through the world’s poorest nations. It is outpacing even the Soviet grain emergency of 1972-75, when world food prices rose 78%. By comparison, from the beginning of 2005 to early 2008, prices leapt 80%. Much of the increase is being absorbed by middle men — distributors, processors, even governments.

At least 14 countries have been racked by food-related violence.The crisis, it fears, will plunge more than 100 million of the world’s poorest people deeper into poverty, forced to spend more and more of their income on skyrocketing food bills.

People worldwide are coping in different ways. Although China has tried to calm its people by announcing reserve grain holdings of 30 to 40% of annual production, a number that had been a state secret, anxiety is still running high. In India, the government recently scrapped all import duties on cooking oils and banned exports of non-basmati rice. Even wealthy nations are being forced to adjust to a new normal. In Japan, a country with a distinct cultural aversion to cheaper, genetically modified grains, manufacturers are risking public backlash by importing them for use in processed foods for the first time.

In the United States, experts say consumers are scaling down on quality and scaling up on quantity if it means a better unit price. In the meat aisles of major grocery stores, steaks are giving way to chopped beef and people used to buying fresh blueberries are moving to frozen. Some are even trying to grow their own vegetables.

A big reason for higher wheat prices, for instance, is the multiyear drought in Australia, something that scientists say may become persistent because of global warming. But wheat prices are also rising because U.S. farmers have been planting less of it, or moving wheat to less fertile ground. That is partly because they are planting more corn to capitalize on the biofuel frenzy. If market forces had played a larger role in food trade, some now argue, the world would have had more time to adjust to more gradually rising prices.

Manners Should Be Taught In School, America

According to a British survey on Monday that showed almost three-quarters of people think manners should be taught at school. A third believe bad manners are the catalyst for much of the anti-social behavior in Britain. More than 90% of respondents believe parents are failing to ensure their children learn proper manners and that bad behavior of celebrities and footballers are setting a poor example for impressionable youngsters. Spitting and swearing were the most offensive behaviors, it found, while queue-jumping and not saying “please” or “thank you” were other main gripes.

Almost 75% of the 3,000 people surveyed believed manners should be taught at school. The head of the Campaign for Courtesy, broadcaster Esther Rantzen, said a lack of discipline was also to blame.

The number of California homes lost to foreclosure in the first quarter surged 327% from year-ago levels — reaching an average of more than 500 foreclosures per day.

The Result: 517 foreclosures every day in the first quarter of 2008. The main factor behind this foreclosure surge remains the decline in home values. Additionally, a lot of the ‘loans-gone-wild’ activity happened in late 2005 and 2006 and that’s working its way through the system. The big ‘if’ right now is whether or not the economy is in recession. If it is, the foreclosure problem could spread beyond the current categories of dicey mortgages, and into mainstream home loans.

Greed does terrible things. People going through foreclosure don’t deserve any kind of sympathy. They should’ve read the fine print. Too many people living above their means to impress the guy next door who is also sinking.

The souring job market and rising costs of the usual teenage indulgences (a slice of pizza, a drive to the mall, the hottest new jeans) are causing teens to do something they rarely do: be thrifty. Jobs for teens have been less plentiful, and parents who supply the allowances are feeling the economic pinch themselves.

Secondhand clothing chains have seen business surge this year as teens and their parents buy popular brands like Gap, Banana Republic and Juicy Couture at a fraction of the regular price.

Teen hiring has slumped by 5% since March 2007, with many mom-and-pop stores, which typically hire younger workers, laying off employees. Hiring in the overall job market fell by just 0.1% during the same period. That’s still not as bad as the 13% drop in teen hiring in the early 1990s. Last month, teen retailers suffered an 8% drop in sales at established stores. The good news is that the under-20 crew is still spending on tech gadgets like iPods, cellphones and headsets.

Job scarcity? There’s plenty of farm jobs and food factory jobs available. Teens are just not willing to work for minimum wage or even higher. Actually illegal immigrants are being hired over teenagers. Teens can’t work past a certain time and can’t work as many hours as an adult, so employers do not want to hire them. Here’s how to survive these new times: swap meet, garage sales, 99 cent store, good will, salvation army and Walmart.

Earners Feel More Secure Due To Their Confidence To Control and Preserve It.

PNC Wealth Management conducted the survey of people with more than $500,000 of investable assets. The Wealth and Values Survey showed that 69% of “wealthy” Americans accumulated most of their money through work, business ownership or investments; 6% percent received money through inheritance; and 25% gained wealth through a combination of inheritance and earnings.

A couple of things separate the earners from the inheritors: First, earners were in control of making their money, and therefore feel more confident about preserving it or making even more. Second, earners likely took large risks to achieve wealth. As we all know, as risk increases, so does return. Accordingly, earners are likely more comfortable with the concept of risk.

Driving the point of risk tolerance home, the report says earners also have a higher risk tolerance than heirs: 39% of earners rate themselves as moderate to risky investors compared with 21% of heirs. Those who inherited their wealth often view themselves as stewards for future generations. As a result, they tend to be more conservative in their approach to investing.

Other Intersting Finds:

•  Heirs are more than twice as likely to say “Having a lot of money brings about more problems than it solves.”

• More people who have earned their wealth (37%) agree with the statement: “The money I have made so far has come from being in the right place at the right time.“

• Far more of earners agree with the statement: “Every generation should be responsible for creating its own wealth” along with “It is more important for children to learn the value of money through hard work.”

Not a bad idea, adults!

Older Americans Are The Happiest

Americans grow happier as they grow older. The study also found that baby boomers are not as content as other generations, African Americans are less happy than whites, men are less happy than women, happiness can rise and fall between eras, and that, with age the differences narrow. The happiness measure is a guide to how well society is meeting people’s needs.

Charted happiness across age and racial groups, Yang Yang, Assistant Professor of Sociology at the University of Chicago, found that among 18-year-olds, white women are the happiest, with a 33% probability of being very happy, followed by white men (28%), black women (18%) and black men (15%).

Differences vanish over time, however, as happiness increases. With age comes positive psychosocial traits, such as self-integration and self-esteem; these signs of maturity could contribute to a better sense of overall well-being. Second, group differences in happiness decrease with age due to the equalization of resources that contribute to happiness, such as access to health care, Medicare and Medicaid, and the loss of social support due to the deaths of spouses and friends.

Looking over the study’s 33-year period, she noticed definite upticks when the nation flourished economically. For example, she found that 1995 was a very good year on the happiness scale.

The Right Pressures or Incentive Will Cause Anybody To Lie

Here are some stats and tips on how to tell if someone is lying to your face:

• Skilled liars don’t break a sweat, but the rest of us get a little fidgety. Four possible giveaways: shifty eyes, higher vocal pitch, perspiration and heavier breathing. Of course, not everyone who doesn’t meet your gaze is a liar. Certain behavioral traits, like averting eye contact, could be cultural and not indicative of a liar

• Another clue: imprecise pronouns. To psychologically distance themselves from a lie, people often pepper their tales with second- and third-person pronouns like “you,” “we” and “they.” So when we lie, we pause longer and speak slower than normal and often experience speech disturbances that serve as gap fillers, such as “um,” “er” and “ah.”

• Upward inflections: We upwardly inflect our words when asking a question. You may have noticed that some salespeople will upwardly inflect certain statements of fact. This is a red flag that should alert you to potential deception.

• Liars are also more likely to ask that questions be repeated and begin responses with phrases like, “to tell you the truth,” and “to be perfectly honest.“

• Touching the nose: We have erectile tissues in our noses, which engorge with blood when we lie. This causes a tingling or itching sensation that requires a nose touch to satisfy.

• Neck rub: We rub our necks because of the stress we experience when we feel that an obstacle may be insurmountable.

• Eye rub: An eye rub is an indicator of disbelief.

• Women are more likely to lie to make other people feel good, while men tend to lie to make themselves look better.

Study Shows Average Age of Management Positions Now 25 Years Old

Generation Y people born after 1981 tend to climb to managerial posts in companies at a relatively much younger age than their older counterparts. Employees born after 1980 tend to first become managers at an average age of 25.3, compared to 31.8 for their counterparts who were born in the 50s. The Y-generation people seem to climb the career ladder faster as they tend to have stronger ability to learn and a stronger work ethic, according to the poll.

Most of the business executives said they do not particularly consider employees’ ages when they are choosing new leaders within their corporations. They choose according to negotiation and coordination ability. The ability to solve problems and professional abilities are more important factors when they are considering promotions.

Interestingly enough, the Y-generation people do not necessarily perform well in management terms. According to company executives, managers aged 39-48 were the best performers.

 Equitable is unlikely to mean the same on every dimension

Women seeking a lifelong mate might do well to choose the guy a notch below them in the looks category. New research reveals couples in which the wife is better looking than her husband are more positive and supportive than other match-ups. The reason, researchers suspect, is that men place great value on beauty, whereas women are more interested in having a supportive husband.

Researchers admit that looks are subjective, but studies show there are some universal standards, including large eyes, “baby face” features, symmetric faces, so-called average faces, and specific waist-hip ratios in men versus women.

Past research has shown that individuals with comparable stunning looks are attracted to each other and once they hook up they report greater relationship satisfaction. These studies, however, are mainly based on new couples, showing that absolute beauty is important in the earliest stages of couple-hood, said lead researcher James McNulty of the University of Tennessee. Overall, wives and husbands behaved more positively when the woman was better looking. Men are very sensitive to women’s attractiveness. Women seem to be sensitive to men’s height and salary.

In couples with more attractive husbands, both partners were less supportive of one another. Men who are more attractive than their partners would theoretically have access to partners who are more attractive than their current spouses. The “grass could be greener” mentality could make these men less satisfied and less committed to maintain the marriage.

 Young people’s financial know-how has gone from bad to worse.

High school seniors, on average, answered correctly only 48.3% of questions about personal finance and economics, according to a nationwide survey released Wednesday by the Federal Reserve. That was even lower than the 52.4% in the previous survey in 2006 and marked the worst score out of the six surveys conducted so far.

Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke stressed in a speech that young people must sharpen their financial knowledge so they are in a better position to make sound investment decisions throughout their lives. College students’ financial literacy also was tested this year. They answered 62% of the questions correctly.

The larger problem is a country where knowledge—especially the kind that may be acquired through schooling—is not valued. That’s why the most popular kids in school are never the top students. That’s why the smart kids get picked on.

The New Economics of Outsourcing

Companies that traditionally rely on India for offshore IT services have been looking for that something beyond India for years, citing such reasons as high employee turnover and unreliable communications. But the search has taken on added urgency recently, especially for U.S. companies, as a weakening dollar has boosted the cost of IT services priced in India’s rupee. Over the past five years the dollar has declined about 16% against the rupee. High real estate costs and expectations for tax increases also have diminished India’s allure.

As outsourcing to India becomes more expensive, North American companies are more inclined to “nearsource,” keeping work in the Western Hemisphere, where they can operate in a closer time zone. In years past a company could save 40% to 50% by hiring Indian firms to handle IT and other services. Should the U.S. dollar continue its descent, that differential would shrink to 10% to 20%.

How much longer the world’s companies will have financial incentive to outsource to India is a matter of lively debate. India’s “advantage as an offshore location is fast eroding—its attractiveness takes a hit with each passing day,” analysts at Forrester Research wrote in a January, 2008, report. Forrester catalogued some of the well-known challenges, such as increasing staffing costs, turnover and strained infrastructure.

The benefit of doing business, from a labor-cost point of view, in such locales as Bangalore, India, will disappear for some companies in three to four years. Indeed, while costs are increasing in India, the country is generally less expensive than Latin America and most other locations, especially for companies that don’t require high-end software developers. The average annual salary for an IT worker in the U.S. is about $75,000. In India it’s about $7,779 and in Argentina, it’s slightly higher at $9,478. In Brazil, the annual wage jumps to $13,163, and in Mexico it climbs to $17,899.

Increasingly, companies want a provider that can nimbly shift tasks and labor among its own global network of work centers. The dollar’s decline aside, even Brazilian firms are benefiting as companies spread their outsourcing around. The real question, if you’re going to sign onto somebody for five to seven years, is do they have a vision for how they’re going to move work around the network.

Are people having four or five children just because they can? Because they feel that it shows their wealth and status?

Raising kids today costs a fortune. Last month, the Department of Agriculture estimated that each American child costs an average of $204,060 to house, clothe, educate and entertain until the age of 18. What’s worse, the desire to have another child opens one up to charges of elitism and status consciousness. In many major U.S. cities and their suburbs having three or more children has now come to seem like an ostentatious display of good fortune. The family of five has become “deluxe.”

We not only wonder, we marvel, we get jealous, we gawk. “Having three kids in the city is a way of showing off, absolutely,” says Elisabeth Egan, who, like many families she knows, moved out of New York to the suburbs of Montclair, N.J., to manage the feat. “A third child in the city is definitely a luxury good.”

A February analysis of Current Population Survey data by the Council on Contemporary Families found that in the past 10 years, the top-earning 1.3% of the population has seen an uptick in families with three or more children. According to the National Center for Health Statistics, 12% of upper-income women had three children or more in 2002, compared with only 3% in 1995.

For a couple’s every conceivable wish or worry, the parenting industry knows the precise formula of guilt, fear, hope, love and desire that will empty the parental wallet. Rather than fret about spending too much money, most parents these days are consumed by the anxiety of underspending on their children.

So parents quickly adjust to the demanding realities of the child-rearing industry. Today’s American children, by contrast, get an average of 70 new toys a year.  Baby showers have replaced bridal showers as the blowout du jour; American women today have an average of three. The accompanying baby registries have mushroomed into a $240 million business. In upscale urban areas and tony suburban enclaves, where luxury families are flourishing, that can translate to $800 a week for child care alone. So-called high-end nannies (those who hail from licensed agencies and come equipped with working papers and even driver’s licenses) can cost more than $50,000 a year on the books.

Most families simply can’t afford all this. And surely it can’t all be necessary.

 The Labor Department on Friday said nonfarm employment fell by 80,000 jobs in March, more than expected and the biggest drop in five years. Financial markets saw this as reinforcing the need for further Federal Reserve interest rate cuts.

Adding to the bleak picture, the Labor Department said a total of 152,000 jobs were lost in January and February, sharply above the prior estimate of 85,000, and the jobless rate jumped to 5.1% from 4.8%, the highest since September 2005. Construction employment fell 51,000, the ninth consecutive month of job losses.

Factory employment fell by 48,000, the biggest decline since July 2003, exacerbated by a 24,000 fall in auto manufacturing jobs that the department said likely reflected the impact of a strike at an auto parts maker. Most economists, having seen a third monthly decline, were now convinced that the economy is in recession.

The numbers drew calls from Democratic presidential hopefuls Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama for aid to families facing foreclosure on their homes, while Republican candidate Senator John McCain said tax cuts and streamlining burdensome regulations were needed to foster growth.

A New York Times/CBS News poll released on Friday showed the economy’s deepening woes were weighing heavily on the minds of Americans. Of those polled, 81% said they believed things were “pretty seriously” on the wrong track, up from 69% a year ago and 35% in early 2002.